As General Counsel at FlexTrades, I spend a lot of time thinking about timing. Not just deadlines, but when the right moment is to evaluate certain issues. For employment compliance, the smartest moment on the calendar for review is the middle of the year.

Here’s why: while most new employment laws take effect on January 1, a second wave lands every July 1. That means a manufacturer only reviewing compliance in January is already reacting. If the law changed in July, payroll has been running, and any gaps have been accruing. A mid-year check flips that timeline. You catch anything the July 1 wave brought in, and you get a full quarter of runway to prepare for whatever takes effect in January, before the holiday crunch and year-end production push.

So, consider this your friendly reminder from a lawyer who would much rather help you prevent a problem than dig out of one. Here are four areas worth a focused look before Q4:

Safety: Documentation Is Key

Summer is a natural pressure point for safety. Heat illness exposure is at its peak, seasonal and contract workers are on the floor, and vacation coverage means people may be stepping into unfamiliar tasks. Three questions worth asking now:

Are your training records current and well-documented? OSHA compliance relies on documentation. If a machine operator was trained on lockout/tagout in 2023 and the equipment changed in 2025, an inspector will ask for the retraining record. Saying “we covered it at a toolbox talk” isn’t a record.

Is heat illness on your radar? Federal OSHA has been focused on heat hazards, and a number of states have their own heat illness prevention standards with specific triggers for training, water, rest, and shade. If your facility runs hot in the summer, a written heat plan may be required, and at a minimum, policies and processes should be evaluated.

Have you allocated safety responsibilities for temporary workers? OSHA protects temporary workers exactly as it protects your direct workforce, and responsibility is shared between the host employer, i.e., manufacturing clients, and the staffing firm. The right practice, and FlexTrades’ standard one, is to spell out in the contract who handles site-specific training, hazard communication, and PPE. If your current staffing agreements are silent on these issues, a mid-year review is the time to fix it.

Wage-and-Hour: Quiet Risk That Compounds

Wage-and-hour violations are rarely dramatic or obvious. They are small errors that repeat every pay period, multiply across a workforce, and then surface all at once, usually with a demand letter attached to a class action. Four items for your compliance checklist:

July 1 rate changes: Several states and cities raise minimum wage rates mid-year, not just in January. If you operate in multiple jurisdictions, verify every location against the current local level.

Overtime on bonuses: This is the one that can surprise manufacturers. Nondiscretionary bonuses, such as production bonuses, attendance bonuses, and safety incentives, generally must be folded into the regular rate used to calculate overtime. Paying the bonus but calculating overtime on base wage alone creates underpayment with every overtime hour. A few states, including always-tricky California, apply their own calculation methods that differ from the federal formula.

Meal and rest breaks: State rules vary, and in states like California, the timing is critical. A meal period that starts even a minute late can trigger premium pay. Reviewing scheduling, in addition to good policy language and procedures, is the effective approach mid-year.

Exempt salary thresholds: Federal and state minimum salary levels for exempt employees continue to increase. An employee properly classified as exempt two years ago may sit below the current state threshold today. Now is a good time to do a review.

Worker Classification: Misclassification Equals Expensive Mistakes

I recently wrote about why misclassifying workers as independent contractors is the most expensive workforce mistake a manufacturer can make, so I’ll keep this brief: state and local enforcement hasn’t slowed down, the tests vary by state and agency, and the bill for getting it wrong includes back taxes, unpaid overtime, and penalties.

The mid-year review should evaluate those contractor engagements that were genuinely project-based in January but now look like scheduled, supervised, open-ended roles in July. Review every 1099 relationship touching your operation and ask whether each one still looks like an independent business serving a client, or has started to look like an employee without the W-2.

And don’t stop at staffing contractors. Exempt-versus-non-exempt classification under the FLSA and state laws deserves review. Job duties evolve, and the “manager” title someone held at hire may no longer match what they do on the floor. The use of artificial intelligence tools that automate job duties also means “discretion and independent judgment” may now be lacking in jobs that once relied on that factor as a primary basis for exempt status.

Documentation: Yes, Again

Every employment dispute I’ve ever seen ultimately comes down to what was documented or wasn’t. A mid-year documentation review is unglamorous but valuable:

I-9s: Spot-check a sample for completeness and timeliness. Verification errors are among the easiest violations for an auditor to find, because the form either complies or it doesn’t, and routine errors add up fast in terms of quantity and financial exposure.

Handbooks and policies: If your handbook has not been updated to reflect laws effective this January and July, it’s already behind. An outdated policy can be worse than no policy, because it documents that you knew the topic mattered.

Compensation plans in writing: If anyone in your operation earns commissions or bonuses, the terms should be in a signed written plan that clearly states when amounts are earned. Several states require it, and ambiguity here is a standing invitation to a dispute at separation.

Incident files: For injuries, near misses, discipline, complaints, and employee investigations, confirm each has a complete, contemporaneous file. Memories fade, but documents don’t.

The Bottom Line

None of this requires a dedicated compliance department or a six-figure audit budget. It requires a calendar, a checklist, and the discipline to look before something forces you to. The manufacturers that handle Q4 and January smoothly are the ones who used July to find the small gaps while they were still small.

If review reveals that your workforce model is carrying risk, whether through misclassified contractors plugging skills gaps or staffing arrangements with murky responsibility lines, FlexTrades was built to solve those issues. FlexTrades offers skilled W-2 technicians, with the employment infrastructure and the written allocation of responsibilities handled. If you’d like to talk through what that looks like for your operation, reach out any time.

Standard lawyer’s caveat: This is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, please consult your own counsel.

As FlexTrades’ General Counsel, a big part of my job is making sure that when a client partners with us, the relationship rests on a foundation that protects everyone involved: our technicians, our clients, and FlexTrades. After spending much of my 20-plus-year legal career reviewing staffing model contracts, talking with clients, and digging into the law that governs our industry, I keep bumping into the same misconception about working with staffing companies.

Allow me to set the record straight: some operations and HR leaders believe that bringing in supplemental workers, whether temporary, contract, or project-based, exposes their company to added legal risk. The worry usually sounds something like: “If we use outside workers, won’t we get stuck with co-employment liability, lawsuits, or benefits claims we wouldn’t have had otherwise?”

It’s an understandable concern. It’s also, for the most part, wrong. And that matters because a flexible workforce is one of the most reliable ways manufacturers meet challenges like sudden swings in demand, a skills gap impacting a critical line, a seasonal surge, or covering a key employee out on medical or family leave.

The real comparison isn’t “staffing vs. nothing.”

Risk is only meaningful in comparison to the alternatives. Let’s break down what we’re comparing.

Compared to hiring employees directly onto your own payroll, partnering with a staffing firm carries roughly the same employment-related risk and, in several areas, less. Compared to filling gaps with independent contractors or gig-style labor, utilizing a staffing company like FlexTrades carries dramatically less risk.

That last point deserves emphasis because it is where client companies can actually get burned. Misclassifying a worker as an independent contractor when the law views them as an employee is one of the most expensive mistakes a business can make. The IRS, U.S. Department of Labor, and state agencies have all leaned hard into enforcement, and the bill for getting it wrong can include back income and payroll taxes, unpaid overtime, plus penalties. Those exposures largely evaporate with a staffing partner for one simple reason: the workers a reputable agency assigns are W-2 employees, fully covered by state and federal employment laws. Our FlexTrades Technicians are W-2 employees of FlexTrades. That status alone does a lot of quiet work to shield our clients from exposure.

The Core Employer Burdens? We Carry Them.

When a FlexTrades Technician is at your job site, a whole category of employer obligations stays with us, not you. Payroll taxes, unemployment insurance, and verifying each worker’s identity and authorization to work are the legal responsibility of FlexTrades as their W-2 employer. Clients are generally insulated from liability in these areas. You get the quality labor, but FlexTrades shoulders the administrative and legal burden behind it.

The Right Person for the Right Job

Lowering your risk doesn’t start with paperwork; it starts with the right match. Before a technician is ever assigned to your site, FlexTrades recruiters review them with real diligence. That means a structured interview to confirm hands-on skills and work history, verification of certifications and credentials against the requirements of your specific job, and a review of references and past assignments. Every technician completes a background check and drug screening before deployment, and we screen for fit with the realities of your environment. This includes the equipment, the safety expectations, the shift, and the demands of travel. The goal is never to simply fill a seat. Rather, the goal is to send you someone who can be productive and safe on day one, because the right match is the single biggest factor in whether a placement strengthens your operation or complicates it.

“Joint/Co-Employment” Isn’t a Trap, and Sometimes It Helps You

Here’s a phrase that sometimes makes people nervous: joint, or co-employment. In most staffing arrangements, the client is considered a joint, or co-employer, because the client supervises and directs the day-to-day work and also controls conditions at the site. That may sound ominous, but in practice, it’s nothing to fear. Your exposure as a joint employer is generally no greater than the exposure you already carry for your own employees, and it is exposure you control through how you run your job site and treat all types of workers.

In one important area, joint employment actually works in your favor: workers’ compensation. FlexTrades carries workers’ comp for our technicians, and because most clients qualify as a “special employer” under state laws, because you supervise the work, the worker consents to the arrangement by accepting the assignment, and the work being done is essentially your work, the protection of the exclusive remedy doctrine typically extends to you as well. Translated out of legalese: if a technician is accidentally injured on your floor, workers’ compensation is usually their exclusive remedy, and you’re generally shielded from a negligence lawsuit. That’s a protection you might not enjoy under other labor arrangements.

One caveat worth its own sentence: companies can forfeit this protection if their contracts go out of their way to disclaim employer or joint-employer status. It’s a good example of why the words in a staffing agreement matter, and why “we’re not the employer in any way” redlines can quietly cost you a defense you might otherwise have.

Where You Still Own Obligations

I won’t pretend that staffing eliminates every employer obligation. Two areas remain a shared responsibility:

Workplace Safety: OSHA protects temporary workers exactly as it protects your internal workers, and the staffing firm and the host, or client, employer share responsibility for safety. The right move, and FlexTrades’ standard practice, is to spell out each party’s role in the contract: site-specific training, hazard communication, PPE, and the rest. Clear allocation protects workers’ safety and creates consistency in the event of a workplace injury.

Equal Employment Opportunity: A staffing arrangement does not shield any party from civil-rights law. You cannot discriminate against or harass a technician any more than you could one of your own employees, and you can be held liable if your team subjects a temporary worker to a hostile environment or retaliation. The standard is the same one you already hold yourself to.

Where You Actually Have Fewer Obligations

Family and Medical Leave Act: For temporary workers, the staffing agency is generally the “primary employer” responsible for providing leave and maintaining benefits. There are headcount-counting nuances, but the core leave obligation sits with us.

Benefits: The lingering fear here traces back to the 1990s Microsoft case, Vizcaino v. Microsoft. Today, the practical safeguard is well established: make sure your plan includes clear exclusionary language and is reviewed by experienced benefits counsel. A word of caution: don’t impose arbitrary caps on assignment length just to dodge benefits eligibility, because that tactic can actually create ERISA exposure rather than avoid it.

Affordable Care Act: Compliance generally rests with the staffing agency as the common-law employer, not the client.

The Bottom Line

Handled correctly, with W-2 employees, a legitimate staffing partner, and a contract that allocates responsibilities clearly, a flexible workforce isn’t a liability you take on. Rather, it’s risk you hand off. The companies carrying the most exposure today aren’t the ones working with staffing firms; they’re the ones leaning on misclassified independent contractors to plug workforce gaps.

That’s what I most want clients to hear from me as FlexTrades’ General Counsel: our model is built so you get the skilled people you need without inheriting the headaches. We carry the employment infrastructure. We put the responsibilities in writing. And we structure the relationship so that the protections, like the workers’ comp exclusive remedy, actually reach you.

If you’d like to talk through how this arrangement looks for your operation, that’s a conversation we welcome. Reach out any time.

Standard lawyer’s caveat: This is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, please consult your own counsel.